In the realm of professional management , there are events of professional negligence that slip through the cracks , and then there are stories that put a spotlight on moral failures. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, epitomizes such a situation— a chronicle of dubious professional actions that deeply harms the reputation of a solitary executive but throws doubt over the firm’s standards .
In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has held onto his title , visibly unaffected by the controversies engulfing him. How has this been allowed to persist ? What does this say about the firm’s focus on transparency ? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of inappropriate actions was initiated by breaking of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t cease there. Instead, it evolved into a series of ethical breaches that has left coworkers disillusioned and stakeholders confused .
During a leadership training program — intended to foster better management—David Collins allegedly turned what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a sequence of unprofessional occurrences. Allegations indicate he spent corporate-sponsored travels pursuing romantic liaisons , a glaring violation of Ventia’s organizational standards, all while his loved ones stayed unaware .
But the misconduct didn’t cease at those affairs. One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged exploitation of company IT systems to distribute inappropriate images to women—a blatant abuse of professional tools and a breach of trust . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to transmit inappropriate content —including icons to boast about infidelities — creates a portrait of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly progressed his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on repeated times during business days , despite his own marital status and her having a partner . This blatant misuse of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but led to familial breakdowns —creating a trail of betrayal that extended far beyond the workplace .
How can this behavior be Ventia New Zealand tolerated to persist ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly overstepped every rule is still employed at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, is rooted in a problematic dearth of accountability within the company . Complaints have been made , yet Collins acts without consequences .
This lack of consequence sends a dangerous message : that title and position within the firm can serve as a safeguard. It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , discourages team members, and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .